Aggregation of binary evaluations: a Borda-like approach

نویسندگان

  • Conal Duddy
  • Ashley Piggins
  • William S. Zwicker
چکیده

We characterize a rule for aggregating binary evaluations – equivalently, dichotomous weak orders – similar in spirit to the Borda rule from the preference aggregation literature. The binary evaluation framework was introduced as a general approach to aggregation by Wilson (J. Econ. Theory 10 (1975) 63-77). In this setting we characterize the “mean rule,” which we derive from properties similar to those Young (J. Econ. Theory 9 (1974) 43-52) used in his characterization of the Borda rule. Complementing our axiomatic approach is a ∗Financial support from the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation through MICINN/FEDER grant ECO2010-21624, the NUI Galway Millennium Fund and the Irish Research Council co-funding from the European Commission is gratefully acknowledged. Conal Duddy conducted this research while visiting the Centre for Philosophy of Natural and Social Science at the London School of Economics. He is grateful for their hospitality. Thanks to Felix Brandt, Franz Dietrich, Nicholas Houy, Marcus Pivato and the participants at PET 13 for their helpful comments. This joint project began after we attended a workshop on New Developments in Judgement Aggregation and Voting Theory, held in Freudenstadt, September 2011. The workshop was organised by Clemens Puppe and Klaus Nehring. We are extremely grateful to them for organizing this workshop, and for providing financial support. †J.E. Cairnes School of Business and Economics and the Whitaker Institute, National University of Ireland Galway, Ireland. Email: [email protected] ‡J.E. Cairnes School of Business and Economics and the Whitaker Institute, National University of Ireland Galway, University Road, Galway, Ireland. Email: [email protected] §Department of Mathematics, Union College, Schenectady, NY 12308, USA. Email: [email protected]

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Supervised Kemeny Rank Aggregation for Influence Prediction in Networks

Identifying influential individuals in a network is commonly addressed through various socio-metrics like PageRank, Hub and Authority scores [1], etc. These metrics are primarily based on the actor's location in the network [2] and often captures only a subset of the critical factors that are usually at play while predicting influence in networks like, relationship of the network (type of edge)...

متن کامل

Impossibility Theorems and the Universal Algebraic Toolkit

We elucidate a close connection between the Theory of Judgment Aggregation (more generally, Evaluation Aggregation), and a relatively young but rapidly growing field of universal algebra, that was primarily developed to investigate constraint satisfaction problems. Our connection yields a full classification of non-binary evaluations into possibility and impossibility domains both under the ide...

متن کامل

Properties of fuzzy relations and aggregation process in decision making

In this contribution connections between input fuzzy relations R1, . . . ,Rn on a set X and the output fuzzy relationRF = F(R1, . . . ,Rn) are studied. F is a function of the form F : [0, 1]n → [0, 1] and RF is called an aggregated fuzzyrelation. In the literature the problem of preservation, by a function F, diverse types of properties of fuzzy relationsR1, . . . ,Rn is examined. Here, it is c...

متن کامل

بهبود روش تصمیم‌گیری گروهی بوردا با کمک محاسبات نرم

  Borda count is a well-known social choice method, and is frequently used for group decision making problems. However it does not consider the optimism/pessimism view of the director, which has a great effect on the group decisions. Therefore in the present study, we extend the Borda method by using the Ordered Weighted Averaging (OWA) operator to consider the risk attitudinal characteristics....

متن کامل

A new last aggregation compromise solution approach based on TOPSIS method with hesitant fuzzy setting to energy policy evaluation

Utilizing renewable energies is identified as one of significant issues for economical and social significance in future human life. Thus, choosing the best renewable energy among renewable energy candidates is more important. To address the issue, multi-criteria group decision making (MCGDM) methods with imprecise information could be employed to solve these problems. The aim of this paper is ...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Social Choice and Welfare

دوره 46  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2016